< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1986 and Before Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >


Why not to run government like a business

Published 12-Dec-1986 in the Denver Post
Copyright ©1986 by Ed Quillen. All rights reserved.

Even after the election, there is still serious talk that government ought to be run like a business. It's an interesting notion, so I tried to imagine what would happen if our current national CEO, Ronald Reagan, were called before the Board of Directors for his annual performance review.

Mr. Reagan, when you came aboard, you said a major priority would be reducing Americorp's huge standing debt. Yet the long-term debt has more than doubled in the six years you've been in charge.

That reminds me of a story. You see there was this family -- families are truly the pillar of Americorp -- in Illinois, or maybe it was Iowa. Anyway, they were in one of our great midwestern . . .

Never mind, Mr. Reagan. We have a more pressing matter to discuss -- our foreign dealings. Do you recall that the Board made it quite clear that you were to limit corporate assistance to our Contra subsidiary in Nicaragua?

What Contra subsidiary? We don't have any subsidiaries there. Oh, I know, some of our employees have been helping out down there during their free time, out of the goodness of their hearts. That must be what you're talking about.

Mr. Reagan, corporate policy, as set by the board, is to limit Contra assistance to medical benefits in our takeover bid. And yet we understand that you have defied our policy and gone far beyond your authority. You provided ammunition, weapons and transportation. You'd better have a good explanation for this flagrant disobedience.

Gentlemen, the Contra non-subsidiary received that assistance from external sources -- a Swiss bank account.

The Board is quite concerned about this, Mr. Reagan. It's damaging our public image. Do you know anything about this Swiss bank account?

Why should I? Volunteerism is what makes our company so great. If people want to contribute to a noble cause, that's their right.

Of course it is, Mr. Reagan. But we have reason to believe that Americorp funds were secretly diverted to that Swiss account. Even worse, it appears that the money came from transactions specifically forbidden by the Board.

I'm not sure I understand.

Mr. Reagan, you announced a corporate policy that Americorp would not do business with terrorists or anyone who supported terrorists. Iran supports terrorists, including the people who killed our security employees in Beirut. So we shouldn't be doing business with Iran, right?

Of course not.

But yet Americorp somehow arranged to sell arms to Israel, which would then sell the arms, at an exorbitant mark-up, to Iran -- a company you agreed we should not be dealing with. In return for this favor, Iran would release a hostage with each arms transaction. And the profits from these sales would go to the Swiss bank account, which in turn funded the Contra subsidiary's takeover attempt -- assistance that you were specifically forbidden from rendering.

That's awful. I didn't know anything like that was going on. I'll have to look into it. You know how it is. Sometimes your subordinates overstep their job descriptions.

Mr. Reagan, didn't you hire those subordinates? Aren't they directly accountable to you? Isn't it part of your duty to hire trustworthy people and to monitor their work?

Whether they follow corporate policy or not, they're all dedicated and loyal employees.

Mr. Reagan, the Board sees only two possibilities. The first is that you've known about and approved of all these improper actions, which means you have violated our charter, policies and by-laws, and you're unfit to continue. The second is that all this was going on behind your back, which means you're an incompetent manager. You hired the wrong people, and then didn't monitor them. You've shirked your sworn responsibilities. You're either dishonest or incompetent.

The CEO leaned back and issued one of his charming smiles. That might be so, gentlemen. But I'm not worried about keeping my job here.

Why not? the Board demanded in unison.

Because under our charter, you'd have to replace me with the vice-president. And he's in this deeper than I am.


< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1986 and Before Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >