< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1991 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >


The center for the evaluation of youthful indiscretions

Published 20-Nov-1991 in the Denver Post
Copyright ©1991 by Ed Quillen. All rights reserved.

Deep in the cloisters of the Institute of Conventional Wisdom lies the Center for the Evaluation of Youthful Indiscretions. That's where they decide whether

the follies of one's jejune days can be overcome.

The Center's director, Dr. Rhadamanthus A. Minos, explained how they operate.

Our most recent ruling was on David Duke, Minos said. He was once a grand wizard in the Ku Klux Klan. The issue was whether he could be absolved of juvenile racism, so that he could join the mainstream Republican party.

And he couldn't, I said. But I don't know why. He sounded like George Bush or any other GOP candidate these days. Most of them have belonged to all-white country clubs and the like. As a congressman, Bush voted against the civil rights bill in 1965, and now he often threatens to veto new civil rights legislation. Why were these other Republicans exonerated of racism, while Duke wasn't?

Minos sighed. Class and money. When an educated man of means like George Bush says he is against welfare, crime, quotas, abortion and gun control, he's a responsible conservative. When a redneck former Klansman says the same thing, he's a bigot. We have determined that a Klan stain, unlike an all-white club membership or a vote against a civil-rights bill, is indelible.

I moved on. Why was Clarence Thomas forgiven for smoking pot, when Douglas Ginsburg wasn't?

Our rules are very straightforward here. If you smoked marijuana as an undergraduate, and if you claim you only experimented with it a few times, then the Center will forgive you, just as we did with Thomas and Sen. Albert Gore. However, if you touched it after you left college, then it is no longer a youthful indiscretion, and it's out of our jurisdiction.

That made a certain amount of sense. What other issues are before the Center? I asked.

We're working on sexual harassment, so that we'll have a line between the braggadocio of boys and the menace of men. We think the point where a male should know better than to tell raunchy stories to female co-workers is about age 25 or the year 1983, whichever came first, but we haven't reached to a conclusion.

As for politics, former SDS will be pardoned, as long as you weren't a Weatherman. Youthful draft-dodging is allowed only if you're a hard-core hawk now, like Dick Cheney or Dan Quayle.

What about careers? I inquired.

We've received quite a few inquiries from 38-year-old former whiz-kid S&L officers and junk-bond brokers who want to know if they can be pardoned for their sordid previous careers, launched when they were impressionable youths and didn't know any better. However, we'll probably wait to take that up until one of them wants to run as a Democrat.


< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1991 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >