< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1993 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >


What's to fear from 'stealth candidates'?

Published 13-Jul-1993 in the Denver Post
Copyright ©1993 by Ed Quillen. All rights reserved.

Judging by what I read recently in the great organs of secular-humanist enlightenment, the Religious Right of America has a conspiracy underway. The alleged plot:

1. With the election of Bill Clinton, the Religious Right lost its clout at the White House; the cause must be nurtured at the grassroots.

2. Nothing is more grassroots than a local school board, and only rural electric co-op board elections attract less in the way of attention, candidates or turn-out.

3. Even so, openly zealous candidates might lose.

4. So, run stealth candidates, folks who appear as normal as Rotarians but are in fact secretly pledged to advance the causes of Religious Right.

One fact should be noted: anyone who promotes public prayer, in schools or anywhere else, is not a Christian, for Jesus told his followers that When you pray, go into your room and close the door. The Religious Right presumably follows some religion, though, and perhaps someday we'll learn which one.

Anyway, it's hard to argue that religious fanatics, whatever their creed, can't run for office, or that the public can't elect them.

But, we hear, they run as stealth candidates who mislead the public. Indeed. This process is known as American politics. Remember Read my lips and I'm not sending American boys 8,000 miles to fight?

If the stealth candidates gained school board seats, they'd quickly learn some sad truths. School boards serve as rubber stamps for superintendents, and thanks to union contracts and archaic certification laws, school boards have less effect on teacher tenure than they do on the tides.

Suppose the stealth candidates managed to surmount these obstacles, and brought back McGuffey readers, hagiographic American history and morning chants of the Lord's Prayer. So what? Could they do any worse than the current educrats with their falling test scores and rising drop-out rates?

This threat from stealth candidates is about as serious as Chicken Little's warning.

So why the concern? Part of it is that the left, like the right, needs to create bogeymen in order to keep the contributions flowing in.

As for the more than 200 Colorado school administrators who recently spent $397 apiece of our money to attend a three-day seminar on fighting the Religious Right, well, the Religious Right shouldn't take that personally. The educrats will spend freely to keep their power in the face of any perceived threat, be it Amendment One, vouchers, stealth candidates or democracy.

But you or I would the same thing to keep a cushy $75,000 job, and besides, if they're busy networking to create optimal strategies for coping with phantoms, then they're not meddling in anything important where they might do some actual harm. Better that they fret about stealth candidates than start trying to impose the latest fad in self-esteem enhancement whole-language multi-cultural curricula.


< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1993 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >