< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1995 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >


Can you tell the difference between 'racism' and 'anti-drug goals'?

Published 14-Nov-1995 in the Denver Post
Copyright ©1995 by Ed Quillen. All rights reserved.

Last week, more than 400 motorists reached a settlement in their federal lawsuit against Eagle County, which will now have to pay them about $800,000.

They were driving along Interstate 70 in the mountains when the sheriff, in cooperation with federal enforcers, was running the High Country Drug Task Force in 1988-90.

The plan was to identify cars which fit a drug-courier profile and search those cars. Among the criteria were fast-food wrappers on the floor, tinted windows, license plates from known drug-source states and the race or ethnicity of the driver, based on intelligence information from various sources.

Eagle County Sheriff A.J. Johnson said it was unfortunate that racism became the issue and that he knew in my heart that his task force was motivated by anti-drug goals, not racism.

He's a talented man if he can tell the difference between anti-drug goals and racism. In this country, they're pretty much the same thing.

Go back less than a month to the uprisings in federal prisons over disparate sentencing laws.

If you're caught with five grams of crack cocaine, street value about $225, you face a mandatory five years. This happens mostly to African Americans; of the 14,000 federal prisoners serving time under the crack laws, 88.3 percent are black.

But if you're caught with 500 grams of the white stuff that white people like, powder cocaine, street value $50,000, then you could get off with probation. A DEA study in New York found that 71 percent of drug users, and 56 percent of drug sellers, are white. But 91 percent of the people doing time for drugs are black or Hispanic.

That should tell you something about the real purpose of drug enforcement, and if that's not persuasive, consider how substances came to be illegal in the first place.

We could start with one of the oldest drugs, opium, which shows up as nepenthe in Homer, where it is supplied to young Telemachus by Queen Helen after she returns to Sparta from Troy.

How did it come to be illegal in this country? Right after the Civil War, capitalists needed cheap labor to build a railroad east from California. They imported Chinese workers. After the railroad was built, they had no further use for the Chinese, who were in now in the way of progress.

In the words of Western historian Richard Wright, those who attacked drugs ... took a significant second step. They did not just define and attack `immorality'; they associated immoral activities with particular ethnic and racial groups.... attacks on drugs and prostitution became attacks on Chinese, who were supposedly drug addicts ... Such efforts were far more successful at punishing or driving off minority groups than in eradicating the evils under attack.

When Coca-Cola first appeared in 1888, it contained the valuable tonic and nerve stimulant properties of the coca plant -- that is, cocaine.

That was fine until 1903, when one J.W. Watson of Georgia wrote in the New York Tribune that Coca-Cola was the cause of horrible crimes committed in the southern states by colored people.

In 1914, the New York Times blamed cocaine for the improved marksmanship of black men, citing the `cocaine nigger' near Asheville [N.C.] who dropped five men dead in their tracks, using only one cartridge for each.

Thus did cocaine become illegal. With marijuana, the target group expanded beyond African Americans. In 1937, as he persuaded Congress to outlaw a plant, Harry Anslinger said most American pot smokers were Negroes and Mexicans, and entertainers.

Colorado had outlawed marijuana in 1917, with legislators citing the excesses of Pancho Villa's army, supposedly hopped up on marijuana. One history continues that The Colorado Legislature felt the only way to prevent an actual racial bloodbath ... was to stop marijuana.... With the excuse of marijuana the whites could now use force and rationalize their violent acts of repression.

During this same era of reform, Prohibition was adopted, generally after lurid propaganda aimed at German-Americans and their beer during World War I.

Earlier national prohibition efforts, aimed largely at keeping Irish Catholics in their place, had failed, perhaps because the United States never went to war against Ireland, and thus had no national security rationale.

Move to more recent times, and note how quickly LSD became illegal because it was associated with another despised group -- protesters against the Vietnam War.

In fact, I am unaware of any drug law in this country based on anything so mundane as honest science, constitutional rights or life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Our drug laws have always been crafted by one group in order to keep other groups in their place. Often the group definition is racial.

So if Sheriff Johnson, or any other public official, is sincere about avoiding racism in law enforcement, he'll quit enforcing drug laws.


< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1995 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >