< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1996 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >


Wall Street bullish on Uncle Sam Corp. as buy-out rumors proliferate

Published 7-Jan-1996 in the Denver Post
Copyright ©1996 by Ed Quillen. All rights reserved.

Despite a continuing and unresolved battle between hostile management factions, Wall Street remains bullish on the Uncle Sam Corp., with per-share prices rising to record levels while takeover rumors abound.

Some of the stock's current popularity is the result of the month-long stand-off between N. Leroy Gingrich and R.J. Dole, leaders on the 535-member board of directors, and W. Jefferson Clinton, chief executive officer.

The way they have things arranged right now during this partial corporate shutdown, explained Simon Legree, a respected analyst at the Socially Irresponsible Investment Group, is nothing short of brilliant for the bottom line.

Legree pointed out that they're still collecting most of their revenues, and they've got many of their employees on the job -- but they're not paying them. So the corporate net is soaring right now. The stock is a good buy.

This modern management procedure -- don't pay the help, but keep them on the job anyway -- is something we encourage every major company to try, Legree said, and it's refreshing to see one of the biggest companies taking our advice. The 'Republican Revolution' has been great for Uncle Sam Corp., and you'll see the Dow at 6,000 by February if this concept spreads.

Forcing people to go to work without paying them is one of those things that made the company a great performer in years past, Legree continued, and even though Uncle Sam has taken some wrong turns starting with the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, we're back on the right track now.

Legree was optimistic about the future. For a long time, Uncle Sam has been divided about whose backs the corporate budget will be balanced on. Now we know. And if the employees don't like it, what are they going to do about it? File for unemployment, when states are shutting down their unemployment offices? Go work for AT&T and get laid off there?

Alexander Hamilton XIV, an analyst at Scrooge & Marley, discounted the short-term benefits of the You have to come to work but you may not paid policy at Uncle Sam, and said he was encouraged instead by Uncle Sam's long-term commitment to contemporary management principles.

For instance, Hamilton said, the better companies these days don't try to do everything in-house. They out-source if the job can be done better and cheaper somewhere else.

Here's Uncle Sam with some pressure to police the Internet. And instead of doing it in-house, the way it would have been done just a few years ago, they let the German government decide what was and wasn't acceptable for millions of American citizens who had used CompuServe for Internet access.

Hamilton noted that Uncle Sam has some troublesome provisions in the corporate charter that might conceivably restrict the company's ability to determine what Americans can see and read -- although, I should add that they usually get around those troublesome charter restrictions by claiming that they're acting on behalf of children.

But by out-sourcing this action to Germany, the company nicely side-stepped those possible problems and their potential for extended and expensive litigation.

Hamilton also praised Uncle Sam for seeing its true profit centers during the current partial corporate shutdown.

Uncle Sam had been running its national park subsidiary at a loss, even though there were substantial profits being made by those gateway communities which captured the majority of the tourist dollars.

Now Uncle Sam is charging Arizona $17,000 a day to keep Grand Canyon open, and Arizona is glad to pay. I'm sure we'll see more of this.

While Legree was excited by short-term prospects and Hamilton saw Uncle Sam as a good long-term investment, neither mentioned the take-over rumors that have also been driving Uncle Sam shares.

For years, we've been buying a senator here and a congressman there as they came available on the market, confessed a portfolio manager for the National Rifle Association who refused to give her name, but now it does look possible to take over the whole company, although we would probably let it operate as a wholly owned subsidiary, rather than merge it into our operations.

But another potential buyer for Uncle Sam, the Christian Coalition, would insist on a full merger, said Judas Silverpiece, chief moneychanger at the coalition's temple.

Well, yes, we do seek a controlling interest in Uncle Sam, Silverpiece said last week. In the right hands, ours, Uncle Sam Corp. could be a powerful force for eliminating abortion, homosexuality, skepticism, tolerance and thousands of other secular abominations.

Uncle Sam Corp. is ripe for a takeover, Silverpiece concluded. We'll be doing our best to get our hands on it, but we're not the only contenders. There are big-time defense contractors and other suppliers who want Uncle Sam to buy weapons that aren't needed, all sorts of subsidized interests buying up shares -- face it, everybody except the general public is interested in getting control of Uncle Sam.


< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1996 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >