< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1999 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >


Solving the mysteries of Y2K, Juneteenth and Qwest

Published 20 June 1999 in The Denver Post
Copyright ©1999 by Ed Quillen. All rights reserved.

For some reason, I receive a considerable amount of correspondence with questions. Often the question is along the lines of Mr. Quillen, when can we expect you remit this delinquent amount so that we can settle this matter without further injury to your credit rating?

Most other inquiries are easier to answer, though, and to save time and postage, I'll try to answer them here.

Q. What's this Juneteenth festival that got our governor attacked for his insensitivity?

A. Our governor hails from Texas, also the birthplace of Juneteenth. Texas, a slave state, seceded from the Union on Feb. 1, 1861, and then joined the Confederacy.

The Union's Civil War strategy was isolate Texas from the rest of the Confederacy (by getting control of the Mississippi River), rather than to control Texas. So Texas had no invading Union armies for slaves (one third of the state's population) to flee to.

By May of 1865, after the surrenders of Robert E. Lee in Virginia and Joe Johnston in North Carolina, the only functioning Confederate army department was Texas under Gen. Kirby Smith, who formally surrendered on June 2. Later that month, the Yankee occupation army arrived under the command of Gen. Gordon Granger.

Texas historian T.R. Fehrenbach writes that on June 19, 1865, Granger proclaimed that the authority of the United States over Texas was restored, that all acts of the Confederacy were null and void, and that the slaves were free. This was the historic 'Juneteenth,' afterward celebrated by Texas Negroes as Emancipation Day.

As to why it is celebrated in Colorado, whose soil has not been under the Lone Star flag since 1850, we have other ethnic celebrations -- Cinco de Mayo and St. Patrick's Day come to mind -- so why not?

As to whether Gov. Bill Owens erred by scheduling a conference on youth violence at the same time as Juneteenth, there's so much going these days that everything conflicts with something.

Q. What's the K stand for in Y2K?

A. Y2K is short for Year 2000, and the K is an abbreviation for kilo, the somewhat familiar metric prefix that means 1,000 of something, as in kilometer or kilowatt. It comes from the Greek word khilioi, which means, you guessed it, 1,000.

Note that kilometer is abbreviated km and kilowatt is kw. So if we're talking about how computers handle dates of two kiloyears, doesn't consistency demand that it be the 2KY problem?

Bytehead jargon is inconsistent in other respects. Recall that k is supposed to stand for 1,000, then note that a kilobyte is not 1,000 bytes, but actually 1,024 bytes.

That's because computers, being binary machines, work internally with powers of 2, and 1,024 is 2 raised to the 10th power. This is close to 1,000, and thus the kilo prefix in the argot of programmers.

I can remember that much, but I can never remember whether a megabyte is a million bytes, a thousand kilobytes, or 1,048,576 (1,024 x 1,024) bytes. The same holds for gigabyte, in theory a billion bytes (although in Britain that's a milliard).

The letter K also stands for a strikeout if you're keeping score in a baseball game and for potassium if you're in a chemistry class. It's almost as versatile as the fanega, which is 2.75 bushels in Argentina and 8.81 acres in Mexico.

Q. Doesn't a U always have to follow a Q, especially in a state with Official English? So why allow an orthographic anomaly like Qwest Communications?

A. Our letter Q, like the alphabet in general, began with the Phoenicians, who called it qoph and used it for a sound not found in English. The Greeks adopted it, called it qoppa and used it for the k sound. Their kappa letter also served for that sound, so qoppa fell out of use.

The Romans picked it up for the k sound when it was followed by the u sound (the Romans didn't have the u, though, and used v, thus the PVBLIC LIBRARY in imitation of Roman inscriptions on public buildings.)

The Anglo-Saxons in Britain rightly decided that Q was a useless letter (my last name probably comes from the Cuillin Mountains of Scotland), but the French re-introduced it after the Norman invasion of 1066, and English has been stuck with it ever since.

In modern English, the u-less Q indicates a transliteration from Arabic, as in Iraq. It represents a guttural sound not found in English, and we use several representations. I've seen the Libyan leader as Qaddafi, Kaddaffi, Khaddafi and Gaddafi.

The most useful term along this line is qat, an obscure levantine stimulant also rendered qhat, kat and khat -- good words to know when you're playing Scrabble.

To finish answering the question, Qwest is acceptable in Official English, providing that it is pronounced properly: not quest but more like Gkh-west.

Any more questions?


< PREVIOUS ]   [ 1999 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >