< PREVIOUS ]   [ 2003 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >


An argument with a respectable pedigree

Published 22 April 2003 in The Denver Post.
Copyright ©2003 by Ed Quillen. All rights reserved.

In recent months we've all read commentary from people who say I oppose going to war with Iraq, but I support our troops. We have also read commentary which says that this a preposterous position, an attempt to straddle a fence that shouldn't be straddled.

Whatever it is, this position does have an impeccable political pedigree, for as nearly as I can tell, it was invented by Abraham Lincoln.

The story can start in 1836, when Texas declared its independence from Mexico. One reason was that Mexico had outlawed slavery, and the gallant defenders of the Alamo wanted to keep their chattels.

The United States recognized the Republic of Texas; Mexico did not, but eventually agreed to accept Texas independence (with a disputed boundary) as long as Texas stayed out of the United States. But in 1844, the United States began to annex Texas.

That led to war in 1846, when the United States was anything but united. There were two major American political parties: the Whigs and the Democrats. President James Knox Polk was a Democrat; the party's political base was the Solid South, which generally supported the war.

Many Whigs, and others, opposed it. Henry David Thoreau spent a night in jail for refusing to pay his taxes to a government that endorsed slavery and waged an imperialist war, as one biographer put it.

Ulysses S. Grant, then a young lieutenant, fought with distinction, but wrote that the war was a conspiracy to acquire territory out which slave states might be formed for the American Union. as well as one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation.

One could argue that Grant opposed the war but supported the soldiers. However, he was not in political life in 1846, and the words come from his memoirs, written nearly 40 years later.

Abraham Lincoln was in political life then. After several terms in his state legislature, the Whig lawyer was elected to Congress in 1846.

Like Grant, he believed that the United States had tried to provoke Mexico into firing the first shots by marching into the disputed territory between the Nueces River and the Rio Grande. Lincoln demanded to know the exact location of the spot where the first blood was shed.

President Polk, the dominant congressional Democrats and the national newspapers all ignored Spotty Lincoln. Back home in Illinois, though, he got plenty of attention for his opposition. A Springfield newspaper predicted that Lincoln would be repudiated by the great mass of people who voted for him, and that he would have a fearful account to settle with veterans when they got home.

At a public meeting, Lincoln was denounced as the Benedict Arnold of our district who had launched a base, dastardly, and treasonable assault upon President Polk.

Even Lincoln's law partner and fellow Whig, Billy Herndon, was alarmed by Lincoln's opposition. Instead of attacking Pres. Polk, Herndon wrote, Lincoln should argue that if it shall become necessary to repel invasion, the President may, without violation of the Constitution, cross the line, and invade the territory of another country.

Lincoln refused to accept that argument. Allow the president to invade ... whenever he shall deem it necessary ... and you allow him to make war at pleasure, which would put our President where kings have always stood, he replied.

Further, Lincoln pointed out, he had every intention of voting for appropriations to supply the soldiers in the field, even if he didn't think they had any business being there.

There were political risks in this position. One prominent Chicago Whig, Justin Butterfield, refused to condemn the Mexican War. That was a surprise, since he had opposed the War of 1812. But as he explained, I opposed one war, and it ruined me. From now on I am for war, pestilence and famine.

Opposing the Mexican War hurt Lincoln's political career, no matter how much he protested that he supported the troops. He did not get another term in 1848. Even though he campaigned hard for the successful Whig presidential ticket that fall, he did not get a patronage appointment, and had to go back to his law practice.

Eventually he did attain some political success. After the Whigs fell apart in the 1850s, he joined the new Republican party, and became its first president. Rural Republicans celebrate him with annual Lincoln Day dinners. I have attended some of these, but I have never heard anyone propose to honor Abraham Lincoln for inventing one of the most enduring positions -- oppose the war but support the troops -- in American political history.


< PREVIOUS ]   [ 2003 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >