< PREVIOUS ] [ 2006 Index ] [ Ed Quillen HOME ] [ SEARCH ] [ NEXT >
About a month ago, the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security released a report that covered progress in identifying our country's critical infrastructure, presumably those facilities most in need of protection from terrorist attacks.
The list is known as the National Asset Database, and of course it's not available to the public. It is the result of two requests for states to provide data, one in 2003 and again in 2004.
As the report puts it, The states' unfamiliarity with
identifying CI/KR (Critical Infrastructure/Key Resources)
and DHS's (Department of Homeland Security) lack of
direction contributed to the poor quality of data.
Thus the auditors found many Out-of-Place Assets.
In other words, Homeland Security couldn't figure why these
items were listed when it presumably was looking for things
like power plants, water supplies and major bridges. No
locations were given in the report, but among the
out-of-place assets of 2003 were a groundhog zoo, kangaroo
conservation center, a check-cashing outlet, a bourbon
festival and a mule-day parade.
The 2004 call for data generated more relevant
assets,
but also included noticeable out-of-place
assets,
such as an ice cream parlor, a donut shop, a
yacht repair business, a brewery, several Wal-Mart stores
and perhaps significantly, an apple and pork
festival.
Perhaps some state governments were under the impression
that the more they put on the list, the more federal funds
they might get, so this whole thing could qualify as a
pork festival.
The auditors observed that Indiana lists 8,491 assets
in the NADB, more than any other state and 50 percent more
than New York (5,687).
Further, Some classes of
assets where national criticality needs to be determined
include 1,305 casinos, 25 golf courses, 24 swimming pools,
44 recreational centers and 163 water parks. Other asset
types and quantities reported included 130 public
libraries, 159 cruise ships, 34 Coca-Cola
bottlers/distributors, 244 correctional facilities, 718
mortuaries, 571 nursing homes, and 3,773 [shopping]
malls.
As a loyal citizen of Colorado, eager to castigate our senators and representatives if we do not get our share, I carefully perused the 54-page report. We may not be big on cruise ships and yacht-repair shops, but we do have casinos, golf courses, breweries, donut shops and similar facilities.
However, it did not list any specific Colorado out-of-place assets. All I could learn about us is that we had 422 items on the National Asset Database in 2003, we submitted 872 the next year, of which one was a duplicate, and so we now have 1,293 listed assets. Our neighbors vary considerably, from 305 in Oklahoma and 369 in Wyoming to 3,457 in Nebraska.
It's easy to make fun of the inclusion of a petting zoo on these lists, but the auditors pointed out that the states got little guidance from the feds, and there were no consistent requirements.
Thus some states ignored school buildings, while others listed them, not only because they might be terrorist targets, but because they're often used for emergency shelters -- where people go after a forest fire or hurricane. That's certainly an important element in recovering from a disaster.
And I need not explain in detail the relationship between protecting donut shops and protecting police officers.
Indeed, this war on terror
makes it hard to
determine what might be a target and thus in need of
additional protection.
For instance, the 1993 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York knocked out a significant portion of the nation's communications infrastructure. Among other things, the wire services were knocked out and newspapers could not get their stock-market reports. Our infrastructure improved so much that the 2001 attack, while much more destructive and deadly, barely disturbed communications.
Also, terrorists might prefer to strike places of symbolic value. For instance, as best I know Mt. Rushmore in South Dakota has no military value -- no strategic minerals, no defense plants, no bases, no vital transportation or communication links. But our national psyche would suffer if Thomas Jefferson's nose were blown off by terrorists. And how vulnerable would we feel if suicide bombers penetrated some small-town festival in the middle of nowhere?
Doubtless there is a lot of pork-hustling in the lists
that the states submitted to the federal Homeland Security
Department. And surely funds have been wasted. But I'm glad
I'm not the one who has to make decisions about what's
worth protecting and what isn't -- given the peculiarities
of a war on terror,
how could anyone know?
< PREVIOUS ] [ 2006 Index ] [ Ed Quillen HOME ] [ SEARCH ] [ NEXT >