< PREVIOUS ] [ 2007 Index ] [ Ed Quillen HOME ] [ SEARCH ] [ NEXT >
If we ever formalize the Official Language
of
Colorado, our dictionary ought to define tax
increase,
because it's hard to figure out just what it
means.
The definition problem first appeared, so far as I know, back when the metro area's Scientific and Cultural Facilities District sales tax, one cent on every $10, was up for renewal.
Douglas Bruce of El Paso County is the author of the TABOR (TAxpayers Bill Of Rights), an amendment to our state constitution which limits governmental spending and requires voter approval of tax increases.
Bruce took issue with how the cultural tax should be
worded on the ballot. He said it should be called a tax
increase
because, if it were approved, then metro sales
tax would be higher than if the measure were not
renewed.
It didn't seem quite like a tax increase
to me,
since the rate stayed the same. If you paid 50 cents for a
Denver Post at the news rack on Monday, and then paid
another 50 cents on Tuesday, that's not a price
increase.
So if you paid the culture sales tax last
week, and you pay it at the same rate this week, how is
that a tax increase
?
Such analysis can get tricky, though. If I buy a $30
pair of jeans instead of a $20 pair, I pay more sales tax,
but is that a tax increase
?
Now we face the complications of school finance in Colorado. The legislature approved, and the governor signed, a bill which would freeze school property tax rates in most Colorado school districts.
A tax-rate freeze could hardly be a tax increase, could it? The answer depends on definitions. Assume that the assessed valuation of your house was $100,000, and the school district got 40 mills -- that is, $4 for every $1,000 of valuation. So the tax would be $400.
So if the value of your house stayed the same, so would the tax. But suppose rich people have invaded and driven up your property values. So now the house is assessed at $150,000 (or $200,000 or $400,000). At 40 mills on $150,000, your tax is $600. That's an increase in what you pay, even if the rate is the same.
Suppose the school budget was the same and the district needed only $400 from you. To keep your tax the same, the rate would drop from 40 mills on a $100,000 house to 27 mills on a $150,000 house.
So a tax rate freeze
is not the same as a tax
freeze.
If the rate stays the same on that imaginary
house, the taxes rise as the house's value rises.
But on the other hand, even Doug Bruce doesn't call it a
tax increase
if I buy those $30 jeans and pay more
sales tax than if I'd bought $20 jeans. Then again, it's a
lot easier to select different jeans than it is to sell a
house and move to lower property taxes, so the element of
choice is different. But the principle is the same.
The Republican spin machine has already revved up on the property-tax rate freeze enacted by statehouse Democrats, even though it's essentially the same proposal as many Republican legislators supported a couple of years ago. It was for the same end -- stabilizing the finances for our public schools.
The Republicans didn't call it a tax increase
then. But now Rep. Bob Witwer of Golden says the measure
is a property tax hike and an end run around the [state]
constitution
since no public vote is scheduled. And
state GOP Chairman Dick Wadhams says he plans to use it as
a campaign issue in 2008.
So, please, somebody define tax increase
for
Coloradans. Is it an increase in rates, an increase in
dollars being paid to government, a refusal to decrease tax
rates, or something beyond the comprehension of mere
mortals?
< PREVIOUS ] [ 2007 Index ] [ Ed Quillen HOME ] [ SEARCH ] [ NEXT >