< PREVIOUS ]   [ 2007 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >


Naming the shining, stony mountains

Published 28 October 2007 in the Denver Post.
Copyright ©2007 by Ed Quillen. All rights reserved.

By now we've read everything about the Colorado Rockies except how they trim their toenails. But there remains a question before this baseball season finally ends:

Why is a player a Rockie instead of a Rocky? The team is named for the Rocky Mountains, often called the Rockies.

Thus the singular of Rockies ought to be Rocky, but that's just logic, which often has a remote relationship with English syntax. Rocky is an adjective, and so it has no plural. Rockies, in the sense of the mountain range, always comes in plural form and thus has no formal singular.

Some Denver sportswriter doubtless coined Rockie, but who and when? It may have happened about 30 years ago.

In 1976, the Kansas City Scouts, a professional hockey team, moved to Denver and changed its name to the Colorado Rockies. I should be able to remember whether an individual skater was called a Rocky or Rockie in print, but I can't.

That's probably because I've never followed ice hockey. Martha grew up in Michigan; she says she enjoyed the sport because she loved the ice and it was great fun to out-skate conceited little boys. But I grew up on the plains of Colorado, where it was hard to find water at all, let alone an expanse of frozen water suitable for skating.

The ice-rink Colorado Rockies became the New Jersey Devils in 1982. When the National Hockey League returned to Colorado in 1995, the Rockies name had been taken by an expansion baseball team, and the Quebec Nordiques became the Colorado Avalanche.

Those teams were named for the mountain range. But how did the mountain range get its name?

Mountain range is an imprecise term. We use it to describe all 3,000 miles of Rockies, but we also use it for smaller stretches: Front Range, Park Range, Gore Range, Sawatch Range, San Juan Range, to name a few. Some ranges are called by other names, like Pikes Peak Massif, Arkansas Hills or Wet Mountains.

The Spanish did not apply one name to the whole stretch from Canada into Mexico. In his 1779 campaign into the mountains, Juan Bautista de Anza referred to our San Juans as the Sierra de la Grulla (Mountains of the Cranes). The Pikes Peak massif is Sierra del Almagre (Mountains of the Red Earth); he also has Lost Hills and a medium-sized sierra.

Perhaps the Spanish, coming from the south, did not think that these mountains were any rockier than the others they had encountered.

Coming 27 years later, American Lt. Zebulon M. Pike referred to the Mexican mountains visible from the Great Plains. That's as close as Pike came to naming the whole bunch. Otherwise he has White Mountains, Blue Mountains and the Great Peak.

According to the book Mountain Names by Robert Hixson Julyan, the Rocky Mountains were named by French trappers and traders, who were accustomed to rounded, forest-clad mountains in the East. They translated the Cree word for the mountains to the west into les montaignes rocheuse, 'the Rocky Mountains.'

A 1730 French map had them as the Montaignes de Pierres Brilliantes, mountains of bright stones, which led to some American use of my favorite name, Shining Mountains. But by 1752, Montaignes de Roche, or Rocky Mountains, was the common French name, and apparently the Americans, coming from the same direction, picked up on it. Sometimes it was translated as Stony Mountains, the term Thomas Jefferson used.

If history had taken a slightly different twist, Colorado would be home to the Shining Mountains or the Stony Mountains, the Denver baseball team might be the Colorado Stonies or Shinies, and some sports editor would have decreed whether a player was a Shiny or Shinie or Shiner, a Stony or Stonie or Stoner. Given those choices, Rockie is tolerable, even if it looks like a misspelling.


< PREVIOUS ]   [ 2007 Index ]   [ Ed Quillen HOME ]   [ SEARCH ]   [ NEXT >